Finally, museums should be allowed to keep some objects in exchange for ther preservation of artifacts and the scientific contributions they have been able to make by studying them. Of course you wouldn't want the land returned--people who live off stolen property wouldn't want to return it. Making blanket laws about such things would be the same thing as trying someone for murder even though that person was defending innocent people lives, just because we have laws against killing. Britain has sent back to Egypt some 25,000 ancient artifacts from Britain, some dating as far back as the stone age, Egypt's culture minister said on Thursday. I think it is less about the continuity of culture and more about place. I'm doing a paper on this subject and yes, I believe, if they were in any way moved to another country in the past, the country that houses the original dig site should have everything returned. I dont think that the government would take something they know wouldnt be able to survive in its country because of security, then there is no point of bringing it back but these historical artefacts have great value to the its people and tell of their stories which might not have great importance to someone of a different background. But if that same country is now dominated by a entirely different culture and religion, it is hardly likely that they will be respected by those people, especially when they suggest ideas untolerated by that culture. It is one thing to see an artifact, it is entirely a different thing to visit the culture and people whose ancestors created them giving them a genuine feel, understanding and appreciation of the artifact and what it was that motivated these ancient people to create these timeless works of art. That is an ignorant positionthose people looted those artifacts for their own reasons and looting does happen everywhere after an emergency. artifacts should go on tour we could see the past if they go on tour . And besides usually it's just the rich nations stealing from the poor ones, in the name of "preservation and good care"! Your comment isn't even an argument. What do the paintings in the Sistine Chapel mean to Italy? Think of the Egyptian Rosetta Stone in the British Museum, or the Greek "Nike of Samothrace" at the Louve in Paris (the French call it the Winged Victory of Samothrace). It is an interesting question and does not led itself to an easy answer. they should take it because they probaly worked hard to get it. Sometimes you don't have to invoke science or even the law (which isn't always supporting the right thing anyway) to know what's right and what's wrong. Knitting c. Weaving d. Crocheting, According to the article which of the following arenas of human activity did NOT make the author's list for scholars of visual culture? The thing to consider is that artifcats taken are not/have not always been cared for in the best possible way and sometimes either by lack of understanding or purpose have been destroyed. Now we ve got a great museum to keep the marbles safe but still British museum refuses to give it back. All hundreds of years ago. They are our identity. International biennials, What gendered activity did Ghada Amer incorporate into her mixed media artwork featuring nude women? return, ancientegyptonline.org/th-dynasty-death-mask-to-egypt, Bibliographies for different articles and subjects to do with antiquities trade, www.museum-security.org/artifacts-saz.htm, Article written in the Stanford Journal of International Relations, www.stjosephacademy.org/onlinedatabases, Discovery news article about Egyptian antiquities, news.discovery.com/ises-thorny-issues-110307.html, Good explanation of the history and modern dilemma, Article concerning a recent, major case of repatriation, www.smithsonianmag.com/The-Goddess-Goes-Home.html, Updated on Mar 13, 12 Created on Mar 13, 12, w a fellow of Trinity College, Cambridge, that the British Museum concealed da, Egyptian Cultural Heritage Organisation (ECHO), At the Museums: The Parthenon Marbles Custody Case, Speaking with Greece's Minister of Culture: Taking on the Black Market in Antiquities, Speaking with Greece's Minister of Culture: The Parthenon Sculptures, Fact Sheet: Cultural Heritage Investigations and Repatriations, Should ancient artifacts return home? We're not saying that we're just going to bury the things back in the sand and leave them, what we mean is returning them to their home country, in a museum there. Which description best applies to it? What then? God Bless you man. I think we should return the land because we had no right to this land, it belonged to the Native Americans, we wrongfully took the land killed their people and crushed their culture. infographics! i say that artifacts should me returned i mea its not right that people from Egypt don't have artifacts that help them learn about Egypt. Last Update: May 30, 2022. In the same way that artifacts were taken, peices of land were taken. Turkey especially has large and extremely modern museums. Here's a story that just broke this week that the Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York is planning to give back to Egypt 19 artifacts currently in its collection that were found in King Tut's tomb. What's a society to do? Ok, lets say we bring it back. Artifacts such as the Rosetta Stone in London and the Nefertiti's statue in Berlin both of which were taken away from Egypt illegally are generating millions of dollars every year for those museums and plays a big role in the tourist industry for those cities.So the question for those governments and museums is weather to do the right thing while suffering huge financial consequences. We are doing a court case on this for school, and I say that they should keep the artifacts in their home, but then I thought. Fortunately, many other artifacts are safe in the British Museum. I think artifacts should be returned home because they come from that country, but they shouldn't be returned to countries who can not afford to look after them. They should be taken back to Rome, greece and egypte.t.c, to the people who have every right to them. Given the varied circumstances of past acquisitions, the answer perhaps trickier than a solid position in either camp could account for. | Science Buzz. I think that the artifacts should be returned to their countries. Is this the start of a world-wide trend? I do not think that is ever going to change although i truly hope it does. They'll always keep them out on "long term loan" unless someone goes in and forces an actual legal time limit on it. Thank all of you who support that people need their ancient artifacts to remind them of their past and offcourse I m 100% in favour of the exhibitions around the world. It's so easy for us to discount something just because it isn't happening to us. When you Go to ROM in Toronto, The only genuine pieces made by real Canadian are First Nation section. Thats what i believe. Legally obtained artifacts should remain where they are so that the most amount of people can enjoy and learn from them. That is not entirely true Sukey. haha you missed spelled Louvre!! You wanna hear a real example? Main Menu; by School; by Literature Title; by Subject; . 1a : a usually simple object (such as a tool or ornament) showing human workmanship or modification as distinguished from a natural object especially : an object remaining from a particular period caves containing prehistoric artifacts. More people can learn about and appreciate the artifacts if they are spread out in museums throughout the world. If each country presents only authentic pieces made by them. I merely raise a procedural point. How are we to be educated when artifacts are returned to countries that are dangerous, have closed borders, or express extreme hatred toward certain people? Course Hero uses AI to attempt to automatically extract content from documents to surface to you and others so you can study better, e.g., in search results, to enrich docs, and more. Until there is no external factors there will be no peace!!!!! If something has been stolen, then it should be returned. The human remains question can be just as murky. Sometimes we have to work hard at investigations. Artifacts can be created, in fact the ones being screamed about, are. What if it was never stolen? it away then IT IS NOT OK. Should ancient artifacts return home? Archaeological expeditions are funded by individuals and organizations with the anticiption that a certain amount of the artifacts that are found will be allowed to be exported in return for the work that is performed by the Archaeological expedition. These artifacts belong to Egypt and should be returned. I think in most cases it will be ok. Then they could tell the stories of these objects with the blessing of the nation of origin rather than the scorn. Group of answer choices a. Embroidery b. I agree that cultural treasures should be returned to their country of origin because that is where they belong if something came from africa that means that it can go there without damge according to climate because it was originally from there. If all the artifacts in egypt stay in egypt, all musuems would be full, and you wouldn't be able to find new ones for there is no place to put them!! I strongly believe that it just thievery disguised in a fancier way, if they cared a lot about these artifacts as they argue, they would take them back home and preserve them there. In fact Europe has seen war TWICE in the last century and Paris was nearly destroyed by Hitler. Wasn't there an act past in the 70's to make it illegal to own artfacts and such items or to take them out of its country of origin? A few have also mentioned the issues of education and access - In their current location these items are on display and accessable to many people - Can you guarentee that if the items are returned? yes that is very true they should be going back to there home origin, If all the countries return the artfacts of other countries, it wont take months but hundreds of years! 2 If not, the embassy or consulate of the Country of Origin may set up a center for displaying the artifacts. In the past few decades, some governments have politely asked for objects that they feel have been pillaged from their countries to be returned. In many cases these pieces of art would be lost today if they hadn't been removed. Yes, I suppose a society, or the people in it, needs to know that contracts and agreements will be held true. Paintings appear in the ceiling vault, and sculptures are placed in pedestals. Finders keepers. I feel sick with this case. They are someone's son/daughter, mother/father, sister/brother. You should always return it to the owner. And all these beautiful ancient pottery in Mallibu and Berlin and Harvard and Boston depicting all these figures that I know since I was a child, when learning about Greek Mythology. The culture it came from no longer exists, just people living where it once did. It's the foreign countries decision to do whatever they please with their porperty. In addition, If the museums really wanted to have a piece of the distance countries culture they shouldve just asked permission. The rightful owner (assuming that in this enlightened age we can dispense with 'to the victors . i think they should be returned as long as they will be kept in proper order so that everyone can enjoy them. It just shows how selfish you are, you think there aren't GOOD museums in other countries? I think people shouldn't return them the artifacts might get damaged during the return or in the climate of the area that it's returned to people should keep them and If it's really bad with those countries then they should return them. There are many cases of musuems that have returned artifacts to countries of origin when it has been shown these were not legally obtained. I use some crude logic, but i believe that artifacts are like land. I see the point for returning them, but some of them are not very good reasons. thanks for all who comment on this! Is that illegal? i know someone who unexpectedly found a statue of a pharaoh made of platinum, weighs 750g and its size is about 6-8 inches but they have fear of telling the government of what they've found because of security reasons and of course, money!!! In many cases, the museums can use it as an opportunity to build relationships with tribes, who then donate other objects, sometimes keep the repatriated items in the museum, and even perform ceremonies in the collections. What is the purpose of museums? Zahi Hawass, the director of Egypt's Supreme Council on Antiquities has made it his mission to have as many objects as possible returned to his home country as quickly as possible, especially the famous ones like the Rosetta Stone - which was the key to unlocking Ancient Egypt's hieroglyphic language. If you have a sculpture made today, and someone a thousand years from now has it, that now lives in Jordan, does this mean we should go rip it out of that person's hand? artifacts should be allowed to stay in the museums that currently house them. etc.? Personally, i think the artifacts belong to the country they came from, after all, most of them were stolen. The new Acropolis museum has opened, reigniting the debate over the Elgin marbles. It's difficult to physically move a tomb! If you just go in there and take the artifacts when some people would just like them to stay as they were it would be like stealing! Let scholars and researchers take care of them! So, none will bother to do so. To decide that an invading nation automatically has the right to all the heritage of the invaded nation reinforces an unfortunate precedent. How cool is that? And you need to take in the facts that some countries simply cannot look after some artifacts, and a more advanced country, say, Britain, or the US of A, would have the necessary technology to support them. Completely lunatic. And when someone says all these things then they say Oh this happened 100 years ago, get over it. just think about this.now there are laws that when another county wishes to take an artifact from its county of orgin they need permission from the government and they would exchange it for money. 0 Digital, According to the article, which of the following activities helps contemporary artists receive wider recognition? . At the same time, most of the statues was stolen and almost 2/3 of artifact and temples was demolished. i personally think that artifacts should return the tthe home they came from, if you disturb them they may not rest in peace. Grind them up, then, and use the powder to build something of value to people today.!!! Their bodies should not be disturbed. It is far to simplistic to say "yes return them"! Should artifacts be returned to there country of origin? Is there any way for a private collector to obtain ancient artifacts legally? The one that represents his eternal undying love for your mother - a very interesting cultural concept (most countries' cultures even now don't have that tradition of wearing a ring on that finger to represent marriage) - and display it in a museum. However, countries should do it mutually instead of suing one another in order to demand the said treasures be returned back to them. However, these artifacts are rife with debate regarding claims to ownership. Learn more about Sula with Course Hero's FREE study guides and If in fact we are making progress ethically and in society, then we should function on our progress, not on how things were or what was legal "at the time". Can anyone tell me what happened to the other half of the Rosetta Stone? Thanks, The truth is these "findings" were actaully invader's who stole them then made excuses under scientific discoveries for keeping them.If another country came to the US and "found" acient artifacts on US soil the governement would immediately take them.buy force if necessary so yes all these countries need to give back what they stole..Thats why they had to go somewhere else to find it.it wasnt theis to begin with, i think the person who finds it should be able to keep it. There are countless other cases where objects were taken from the nation of origin without the permission of the people living there. In Nov. 2010, Egyptian antiquities expert Zahi Hawass told NPR that he was fighting to have the Rosetta Stone returned to Egypt from the British Museum. So I don't see this as a stretch. Heinrich Schliemann clearly saw it as a case of 'finders keepers' when he uncovered a cache of gold during his excavations at Troy in 1871-73. So be considerate of other people belongings!!! Generally, in the past the countries of origin have agreed to this and have 'first pick' of the artifacts that are found. In closing, these museums have gained from these artifacts and therefore, can expend the funds to create duplications or exact replicas of them. That entity should then decide the article's fate, as is its right. I was watching the olympics in Turin and was amazed at the musuem they had there that was full of these Egyptian artifacts that were sold by an excavator to the royal family. This makes me think of the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA). In order to learn about their past they need things from their past to provide knowledge. ever know anything about that countries history? Those people who conquer india since ancient time has destroyed its rich heritage too under the name of religion!!. You have ended my 4 day long hunt! Say that the country was in a state of warfare, or encroching poverty, for the time being, it would be wise to keep them in a place/museum where they are safe from danger and will have better protection. Your grandma lent my grandma her car and was naive enough not to delineate on legal paper how long she could "borrow" it because she thought surely people have values and morals and wouldn't do that. Whether return the artifacts or not is a question to debate upon. Many times How and Who found the artifact is just as important as where it was found. Museums like the British Museum have argued that they not only promote scientific research on these objects, but having them in places like London, Paris, and New York allows millions of visitors to come and visit them every year. Pls don;t misunderstund me. I mean, one day human trafficking and slavery are legal, and then all of a sudden they're not?!

Idle Archer Tower Defense Mod Apk, Luxury Furniture Manufacturers In Delhi, Antique School Bells For Sale, Komarapalayam Panchayat, Gamma Function - Matlab, Ping Command Not Found Debian, Importance Of Synthetic Biology, Telerik Blazor Grid Layout,